When a debtor disputes a signed agreement, you have to prove it's genuine, and the proof is often buried in the file in a form no one can read. Tindom validates the document independently and turns that evidence into a plain-language report you can submit to Kronofogden or a court.
A debtor disputes a claim, saying they never signed the agreement. The signed document exists, a PDF with their electronic signature, but having the file isn't the same as proof a Kronofogden officer or a court will accept.
What decides whether you can prove it comes down to one thing: does the file carry a real, embedded seal, or does its authenticity rest entirely on the platform that produced it? When there's a genuine seal in the file, the proof is there, but locked in a technical format the person handling the case can't read or present. We've watched this play out. An admin knew exactly what evidence she needed, couldn't parse the signed file to find it, and ended up needing someone technical to walk the raw data and mark where each piece was so she could submit it.
Many documents carry no such seal at all. Their authenticity depends entirely on the platform that made them, with nothing in the file itself anyone else can check. In a dispute, that's a weaker position than it looks, and worth knowing before you rely on the document.
Tindom checks a signed document independently. Not the platform vouching for itself, but a neutral check against every trust list Tindom carries: the EU trusted lists, third-country lists recognised under eIDAS, the Swiss and UK trusted lists, and the Adobe Approved Trust List. When the file carries a seal, you get back a structured attestation: the document has full integrity and hasn't been altered since signing, who signed it and how, and the supporting evidence, all in plain language, built to be submitted as it is to Kronofogden or a court by someone who isn't technical.
When a file carries no independently verifiable seal, Tindom tells you that too. Knowing a document can't stand on its own is as important as knowing it can.
Tindom confirms a document's integrity and the origin of its seal, and presents the signing evidence the file contains. It's independent, verifiable evidence, not a legal presumption, and not a substitute for legal advice on your specific case. But for the question a dispute turns on, whether you can show the agreement is genuine and unaltered, it's the evidence, in the form you need it.
Handling disputed agreements at volume? Talk to us →